|
|
|
|
|
by noduerme
926 days ago
|
|
My lay understanding of the problem with classical algorithms is basically that a lack of resolution means you need to monte carlo the thing millions of times... which is why it's slow. If you could model it as a set of quantum states of similar inaccuracy, wouldn't that by definition be just as (in)accurate but faster? [edit] this reminds me of something I read about how NASA doesn't predict solar eclipses by trying to keep an exact model of the solar system, but rather uses pattern matching algorithms. |
|
We struggle to predict the exact path of asteroids because of measurement errors, not because computing is slow. Minuscule changes to the initial condition manifest as massive differences in the outcome.