|
|
|
|
|
|
by dmakian
923 days ago
|
|
|
> A question, when GPT-4 contradicts in explanation, how much of them were in fact correct? It was mostly when a card is good in a vacuum but not as good in a specific set. WOE (which this was trained on) skewed pretty aggressive, so GPT-4 was tended to overvalue strong expensive cards (compared to what good players thought at least). |
|
|