|
|
|
|
|
by toss1
925 days ago
|
|
Yes, I certainly agree that validation research needs to be done, and done absolutely solidly before wholesale switching . Yet in this case, the existing tech is known bad (although TBF, the how-bad is well-characterized), and the new technologies are already qualified to fix this bad tech, e.g., carbon-fiber re-wrap of disintegrating steel-rebar bridge columns [0,1,2]. Certainly seems that applications like road-bed construction that require rebar, where the worst-case is a part of the road gets potholes prematurely, vs abridge or building collapsing, should already be mandated to use composite rebar. That would significantly increase the data set that can be used for real-world aging studies, with minimal risk? [0] https://www.hj3.com/blog/dot-bridge-column-repair [1] https://www.advancedfrpsystems.com/how-to-repair-concrete-co... [2] https://hydratechllc.com/resources/case-study-dot-bridge-con... |
|