[mmkos]

Strongly disagree. I do think trivial work is not paper-worthy and it would be more beneficial not to publish such work, as it mostly a waste of time for the peer reviewing it and the readers who will gain nothing from reading it. It's no lie that most publish for the sake of publishing and this post just calls it out for what it is.

[henriquez]

Trivial means different things to different people. I’m not really a fan of LLM hype but it seems to me a valid practice of scientific discovery to evaluate the use and optimization of such models.