[cwzwarich]

Here is the original GitHub issue on the question:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15699

And an RFC by some people that felt frustrated by this arguably implementation-centric view that kind of lost steam:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/391

Intuitively, the bottom lifetime should the one that is uninhabited, which would be a lifetime with no extent rather than 'static.

[almost_usual]

Interesting, thanks for sharing!