|
|
|
|
|
by yieldcrv
934 days ago
|
|
so, when this happened on 9/11 the actual investigation found a stock picking newsletter that had simply called the stock sector for technical analysis reasons this paper only compares volume to prior campaigns in Israel, and draws a conclusions based on that additionally it has the bias of saying these are “gaps in enforcement of insider trading laws”, seemingly not understanding that an insider trading law would not cover things occurring outside of a company. nor should it. its short selling of an ETF over a geopolitical event so its just as likely any random stock picking newsletter could have called it. there’s even a guy on reddit that says Gaza attacks are based on the moon phase and tried to warn Israel, he happened to be not-inaccurate this time but its totally based on correlations only |
|
" But as its name suggests, the U.S. law of insider trading is a poor fit for trading patterns of the kind we document here." (page 38).
So it does seem to understand that insider trading doesn't apply to the data here. I think "informed trading" meaning prior knowledge (not insider company trading) is the relevant point here.