[lijok]

Am I misunderstanding something or does this look like the worst possible incarnation of a monolith? Everything seems to be sharing everything, so whenever you modify anything, everything is impacted. Which in turn, means that a developer who wants to make any changes, has to understand the whole system in order to not break things or make a mess - which of course leads the cautious developer to write new, duplicate code for the piece of shared functionality that they want, defeating the whole purpose.

Happy to be corrected, I hope I'm wrong.

[david-j-vujic]

Yes, to me it sounds like a misunderstanding. Let's imagine that you have code put in libraries, that you can use in more than one place. For any mainstream project, you would probably have these in separate git repos and published to a code repository (such as PyPI or Clojars).

With Polylith, all of that code lives in the same git repo, and you don't publish them to a repository because you have it "right there". For Python, you reference the reusable code just as any other Python namespace package. Basically the same thing for a Clojure namespace.

Everything isn't sharing everything, but several different services or apps could be using one and the same brick (as it is called in Polylith). A brick is a small isolated part of the code (usually much smaller than a library, that is an entire feature). I hope this has cleared some things up!