You believe they accidentally misrepresented the scientists who never mentioned the concept in the headline? Come on.
There is an endless stream of these headlines that misrepresent the scientific claims in a way that just happens to seem designed to make the article more appealing. I'm sure it's all pure coincidence.
> Ironically, you also added the word “deliberately” to make your comment more appealing without any evidence
Yes.
Fun.
A short comment is not the place for evidence.
I could criticise it for hyperbole but actually the thing I do not like is mor e gratuitous unesecsary adjectives....
Given a startling crisp headline for a mild wishy washy article it is reasonable to assume deliberation.
But is it a lie? Or measly an exaggeration?
I care a lot, it's good