[Onlyfansss]

Interesting that you have such a strong opinion about something you apparently don't care for.

I'm happy to tell you that i'm absolutly normal and have a high morals and ethics.

There are people in our society who do not think that Sex, Erotic and the body are disgusting or weird or sick but something great.

Apprechiating this through OnlyFans allows the person who provides the service to do so with their rules and the person who consumes it to feel enjoyment.

I, for example like certain things. The girls/woman there provide it freely and get money for it.

I think you are the problem, not OnlyFans, not me and not the girl taking the money.

And as a site note: We as a society decided to allow every person to take part in our society even weird people, arrogant people, assholes etc. by paying for services. Like the person who MAKES you a Coffee for money.

I actually think (i'm not trolling) that this is sick. Us using others to do things we can do ourselves just because we have the money to do so.

If we wouldn't think its normal, the pressure for society to make people actually free through automisation would be much stronger. But no People need to work, what would happen otherwise if richer person couldn't get a service for convinience...

[grpt]

very odd comment, and from a brand new account. Makes me wonder what your motivations are.

You didn't address anything in the parent comment. You seem to be responding to onlyfans in general, not the fraudulent usage of the chat feature the parent comment is addressing.

[Onlyfansss]

Whats odd about it?

Do you think its normal in our society to state publicly that you think onlyfans is okay/good?

Of course not. We are not a open society.

And he clearly doesn't reference the article with the hook 'problem', he keeps it generic: "(the girl selling and the guy buying)"

Onlyfans is obvously satisfying a fantasy. This has very little to do with real life.

And when you actually buy a private video, its not some dude pretending to chat in the name of the woman, its the woman making that video.

[grpt]

> And he clearly doesn't reference the article with the hook 'problem', he keeps it generic: "(the girl selling and the guy buying)"

They are clearly responding to the article, which is about fraudulent use of the chat feature to extract money from men. It's not about selling pictures or videos.

You seem to be taking all of this as a personal attack on your choice of entertainment, or to create division in the thread.

[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

> They are clearly responding to the article

FWIW, OP posted a comment on a message board for said article. Per my reading, they seem to be talking generally about sex work rather than the specific sex-work-fraud as mentioned in the article. Surely the comment is at least vague enough that it could be taken either way.