Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Voultapher 929 days ago
I'd argue it's worth it.

Some practical ideas, when allocating the money for research 30% or so has to be kept back for replication. Public science is mostly government funded. And the government could allocate X% percent of the budget for replication work. It sounds like a solvable problem to me.

1 comments

I agree in principle but forcing institutions or governments to allocate money for this and enforce is pretty much an unsolvable problem at this point IMO.
Yeah, as I said it's also a question of culture and that's very difficult to change.