|
|
|
|
|
|
by jsnell
928 days ago
|
|
|
It's not at all clear what these payments are predicated on, the deal structure is obviously very different from what the bill originally required. All that's being annouced is that Google is paying $70M/year for something, but it might not be for links. That's what happened in Australia's law from a couple of years ago. The law was ratified, but doesn't actually apply to any company, so what the law said was totally irrelevant. |
|
|