[thinkingtoilet]

"Once anyone chooses that role, they deem themselves more enlightened and therefore more capable than the poor, deluded masses trudging in dirt below from whence they came."

Or they simply want to sell their models to enterprise clients who don't want to expose certain things to their employees during the work day. This reads a bit like those "I'm a lion" or "I'm the alpha wolf" type posts. Go ahead and try to sell a product that can generate hate speech, nudity, and violent content to enterprises.

[A4ET8a8uTh0]

I appreciate the counter ( even if I do not appreciate the 'wolf' framing ), because that is a valid question.

Still, if the concern is about business viability, why is the consumer facing LLM that is not tied to a specific brand not allowed to exist? Surely, the demos provided to enterprise client would not suffer from such violent content, abhorrent nudity and hateful speech?

Why is internet flooded with images of LLMs giving clearly politically adjusted responses ( Biden/Trump being less recent, but clear example ) to Joe Schmoe? Is that a good look? Will that sell to enterprises better?

[thinkingtoilet]

Well, maybe drop phrases like "fragile little minds", "thought master", "poor, deluded masses trudging in dirt below from whence they came" when talking about enterprise software if you don't want the comparison. That's what this is, enterprise software. No need to imply others are mindless sheep being ultra sensitive when discussing enterprise software.

[A4ET8a8uTh0]

My friend. Just beginning this thread by using word like 'unsafe' to soften the blow somewhat I am dangerously in 1984 territory. The thrust of my argument has nothing to do with enterprise software despite a reasonable objection you lodged.

The words were intended to be noticed ( and reacted to ). And they were.

There is a reason for this and goes something like this.

I dislike commercial interests trumping sanity.

Crazy. I know.

edit: I also would like to note you did not address my actual point.