|
|
|
|
|
|
by safety1st
935 days ago
|
|
|
I agree with this, but is this something that should be dealt with in the law or in the license? My gut feeling is that the just remedy is A) the GenAI models out there should get to do what they want as long as they are not violating licenses, B) the libre software world needs to hustle and release new versions of the appropriate licenses that specifically forbid use of the source code to train AI unless the AI itself is licensed permissively. Note that in regards to A) I'm pretty sure the AI firms ARE violating copyright today, they have done this knowingly, and they should get a hard slap for that. But they are not violating any particular copyleft licensing provisions to my knowledge |
|
|
Depends on the jurisdiction. Do note that many countries already passed laws indicating that training is NOT copyright infringement. The EU[1], for example. In which case, no license would matter.
https://www.reedsmith.com/en/perspectives/ai-in-entertainmen...
[1] Yes, in the EU, you can opt-out (but only for commercial purposes). In other countries such as Singapore however, there are no legal mechanisms for opting out.