Wouldn't it be easier to make a `snap install x x x x `
Or `flatpak install x x x x` script ?
Isn't this type of issue what those two project's aim to solve ?
1. Hysp is a single binary (Statically compiled), download & run anywhere kind of package manager.
2. Hysp, doesn't care about dependencies, and neither does it attempt to install anything that's not specifically defined in the config.
3. Due to 1 & 2, you do not need go or rust or anything else installed to install something. No dependencies whatsoever. This saves enormous space, storage & time.
4. As installing random binaries from random sources is not advisable due to security concerns, the pkg-source can be self-hosted by anyone and hysp can be configured to use that instead of the default source.
To address your concerns:
1. Hysp is a single binary (Statically compiled), download & run anywhere kind of package manager.
2. Hysp, doesn't care about dependencies, and neither does it attempt to install anything that's not specifically defined in the config.
3. Due to 1 & 2, you do not need go or rust or anything else installed to install something. No dependencies whatsoever. This saves enormous space, storage & time.
4. As installing random binaries from random sources is not advisable due to security concerns, the pkg-source can be self-hosted by anyone and hysp can be configured to use that instead of the default source.