Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by odyssey7 937 days ago
How would you explain the relationship between MNX and SMuFL?
1 comments
adrianh 937 days ago
They're totally different things, though the standards are maintained by the same people.

SMuFL is a font layout specification. It solves the longtime problem of "I'm making a music font. Which Unicode code glyph should I use for a treble clef?" For many years, this was a Wild West situation, and it wasn't possible to swap music fonts because they defined their glyphs in inconsistent ways. This problem is basically solved now, thanks to SMuFL.

MNX is a way of encoding the music itself. It solves the problem of "I have some music notation I want to encode in a semantic format, so it can be analyzed/displayed/exported/imported/etc."

link
odyssey7 937 days ago
Thanks. If it isn't too many questions, are any layout concerns encodable in MNX, or is it scoped to semantic information only?
link
adrianh 937 days ago
Yes, the goal is to allow people to encode layout information optionally — as a separate layer from the semantic information.

One particularly cool thing is the ability for a single document to have multiple layouts (!), which is useful for parts vs. conductor scores. See here for an example: https://w3c.github.io/mnx/docs/mnx-reference/examples/multip...

link
odyssey7 937 days ago
Much appreciated! This is excellent work.
link