[InSteady]

And contrary to conservative / pro-gun talking points, most mass shooters are not mentally ill nor are they on psychotropic drugs. It's a circular kind of logic, "they must be insane to want to shoot a bunch of innocent kids" so therefore they are mentally ill by definition.

That's not how mental illness works. By and large they are just sadistic nihilistic pieces of shit who want to live out violent fantasies for kicks before ending their garbage existence.

[User23]

The overwhelming majority of mass shooters are urban career criminals either actively engaging in some kind of crime or getting in stupid disputes over perceived disrespect. These stories pretty much only show up in local if-it-bleeds-it-leads coverage. The troubled white boy shooting up his school gets a lot of national press, because it fits a narrative the political elite wants to push, but those media darling cases are an absolutely tiny minority of mass shooting events.

[gillytech]

The latter, the school boys, are nearly to a one on some kind of psychiatric drug.

[manuelabeledo]

Even if that was true, which is not, what kind of scientology BS is this? There is absolutely no proof that psychiatric meds push teens to commit mass shootings.

[User23]

What evidentiary standard would that “proof” have to meet to satisfy you? Is there one? If not then you’re just expressing a political belief and not a scientific one.

[manuelabeledo]

> What evidentiary standard would that “proof” have to meet to satisfy you?

So, asking for proof of a so far unsubstantiated statement, is a "political belief" now?

What did I miss?

[User23]

> What did I miss?

Evidentiary standards, it appears. You literally just admitted to not having any.