[owenpalmer]

People who use "make your own game" games aren't good at making games. They might enjoy a simplified process to feel the accomplishment of seeing quick results, but I find it unlikely they'll be competing with indie developers.

[CamperBob2]

Careful with that generalization. Game-changing FPS mods like Counterstrike were basically "make your own game" projects, built with the highest-level toolkits imaginable (editors for existing commercial games.)

[CaptainFever]

Yeah, and if there was going to be such a tool, people who invest more time in it would be better than those casually using it. In other words, professionals.

[mattigames]

Not really, "I" can make 2D pictures that look like masterpieces using stable diffusion and didn't invest more than 6 hours playing with it, the learning curve is not that high, and people already have a hard time telling apart AI art than those from real 2D masters who have a lifetime learning it, the same thing will happen with making videogames and 3D art.(Yeah nothing of this looks exiting to me, actually it looks completely bleak)

[CaptainFever]

I didn't mean comparing it to human-created art, I meant comparing it to other AI generated or assisted artworks. Currently the hard parts of that would probably be consistency, fidelity (e.g. multiple characters) and control, which definitely stands out when compared against the casual raw gens.