[PH95VuimJjqBqy]

as stated in another response to you, stop being dishonest in your replies. This distinction of ported vs planned is one that doesn't exist when discussing exclusivity to a console.

It's also not relevant when discussing studio's adding support for multiple consoles to their in-house game engines.

[scott_w]

The distinction is relevant when YOU YOURSELF call console exclusivity a “scam.” Your words.

[PH95VuimJjqBqy]

My actual statement with added emphasis.

> exclusives are generally a _lock-in scam_ for the companies and say absolutely nothing about the games on a system.

stop being dishonest.

But even if you weren't mischaracterizing my statement, console exclusivity means only that console has the game. Whether it was planned ahead of time or done after the fact is irrelevant, the game is not exclusive when it becomes available for multiple platforms. It's a distinction that does not matter.

[scott_w]

You’re obsessed with deceit and dishonesty. First you accuse game developers of a scam (deceit), which I’ve demonstrated it’s not. When I do, you accuse me of dishonesty. Nothing you provided is substantiated with any evidence. On the contrary, everything you did provide brought your argument crashing down.

The only one arguing with bad faith here is you.

[PH95VuimJjqBqy]

The ad hominem is a strong indicator that you don't have a leg to stand on.

[scott_w]

I see you subscribe to the “accuse others of what you are guilty” school of debate.

[PH95VuimJjqBqy]

I don't find it surprising you don't know what an ad hominem is. hint: it doesn't mean someone said something to you that you don't like.