[Dylan16807]

It doesn't really account for that, true. But copyright isn't the only control. If you've never distributed something, that generally falls under basic privacy.

But if you've already put 50 thousand copies out into the world, it should stay available in some reasonable form.

[WendyTheWillow]

Why? Why do you lose rights to something when you share it, even if everyone you share it with agrees not to also share it?

[Dylan16807]

I used 50 thousand as the example number for a reason. At that point it's clearly public distribution.

[WendyTheWillow]

Nope, each and every one of those 50k agreed not to share your content publicly. You wouldn't have let them see what you made if they hadn't!

[Dylan16807]

I refuse to engage with such an unrealistic scenario.

Except to say that's still enough people to count as public in my book.

If you want to talk about something more realistic, I'm game.

[WendyTheWillow]

You refuse to engage with how nearly all media is released today?

[Dylan16807]

You're talking about copyright as that agreement? Not a personal promise not to share things?

In that case, then I don't comprehend your "nope" at all. Mass market sales are public distribution.