[freejazz]

>You should care because it will save the average western family ~$5k/year and reduce the 1.5million fatal accidents and >10million serious injuries that result from car crashes worldwide.

When? What's the social cost to affording these companies public spaces to test their products?

[enslavedrobot]

Drivers are testing the product. I use FSD all the time. It's my choice.

If think that's making you unsafe too bad for you. I think it's vastly more unsafe to share the road with a million half blind geriatrics but nobody suing the AARP.

[x86x87]

You are sharing the road. So if your car does something stupid that gets me killed you cannot claim that "hey bro, i'm just testing it". Also, I am not sure that you are qualified to test a car and not sure that legally you are allowed to test things on public roads.

[enslavedrobot]

I accept all liability and my insurance is happy to accept my payments. If I don't pay attention and kill you it's my fault. Just like if I drink and drive.

[freejazz]

Does your insurer actually know you aren't driving your car?

[freejazz]

> I think it's vastly more unsafe to share the road with a million half blind geriatrics but nobody suing the AARP

You seem to be either incredibly confused, or just making a bad-faith analogy.