[scrapheap]

> The majority of them said that they were able to reduce the time required for building. Imagine a project that used to take three days, is now wrapped up in just one and a half days! Thanks to AI, we're talking about a 50% reduction in completion time

I don't know about other people but the time I spend coding isn't the majority of the time a project takes. Most of the time and effort goes into all the stuff around the coding - investigating the issues being addressed, specifying what a solution would do, testing the solution built, etc.

> Do you think AI is a threat to a developer's job?

I don't think it's a threat to skilled developers. Personally I'm looking forward to a long career fixing up all the code produced by below average developers relying on AIs without any real understanding of the code being produced :D

[MyelinatedT]

Completely agree with this. Problems are solved by people, not code. Code is a tool that can either improve, degrade or leave unchanged the state of a system/service. Plus, code is usually the easiest, quickest bit of the process (perhaps with the exception of some huge legacy monoliths).

LLMs can be useful for improving developer velocity, but the key skills that make good software developers good have yet to be emulated well by AI.

> Personally I'm looking forward to a long career fixing up all the code produced by below average developers relying on AIs

“Looking forward” is a bit of a stretch… :)