|
|
|
|
|
|
by strontian
932 days ago
|
|
|
Watching videos serves a diferent role than interactive b/c you get to take in audio and visual together, which _can_ support a higher bandwidth learning(depending on quality of the video). Also, for unfamiliar subjects, it’s useful to be exposed to the concepts and constructs first so you can build a mental scaffoliding that supports the details. Speech seems to be a better medium for that. Interactive, like other info sources that present info linearly and in high detail are much less efficient, but allow you to learn the ‘doing’ aspect that a video would not. But I am curious about what you’ve made. How has the reception for this type of info product been so far? |
|
|
Related:
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32342334
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37941075
On average I'd say we get a 50/50 split between folks who like the doing/challenge aspect of it, vs those who wished there was more "consuming" type of content, e.g vidoes/text