|
|
|
|
|
by kian
939 days ago
|
|
The only way for this technology to replace humans is if people actively choose generative art over humanity's regenerative art. Do you think you'll be replacing your artistic consumption with mostly auto-generated fare? If not, then is this repulsion you speak of aimed at generative AI, or is it aimed at some hypothetical other people of less discriminating taste who would actively choose to consume it instead of human art? I guess I'm late to the party, but it is starting to feel as if complaints about generative art are actually complaints about other people. Damn kids and their rap music. Get off the lawn, right? |
|
I do worry that as generative AI becomes normalized, many people who could have brought a unique perspective to the world and expressed it in their own way will instead be lured down the path of being guided and influenced by those systems instead of doing the work themselves.
Something like the concerns John Taylor Gatto presents in The Seven Lesson Schoolteacher, but with seductive ease of creation as the primary mode of influence, rather than top-down authority.
If it takes them a few decades to work that out, they'll be past the point in life when mastering artistic and expressive skills is most-effectively learned.
It's not hopeless, but it's absolutely a direction I don't want our culture to go in.