[insanejudge]

You'd imagine if it was very predictable, that long term population projections wouldn't radically swing by billions and decades of trajectory every few years like they do.

As far as I can tell, this narrative has been pushed by prominent EA'ers and such to try to counter the calls for research/investment in renewables and responsibility over the data on climate change with culture war fears demanding short-term growth.

Addressing the largest stated reasons for not having children (affordability and child care), or physics-defying carbon capture machines, What could actually exist in 30 years I wonder?