[akira2501]

> Intel actually did a lot in the last decade.

That's the expected case when you have tons of cash and market dominance.

> are making a reactionary take about the lack of post-Skylake microarchitectures

Or about the general inability of large monopolies to effectively compete and continue to deliver according to market expectations.

> or years because they care about video games more than safety.

And yet, they still had a "server chips" division for much of that time.