|
|
|
|
|
|
by Volundr
934 days ago
|
|
|
> (and juuuust in case you're going to do the Law Doesn't Say thing again about accepting programming, it doesn't need to. it's already a thing.) In other words your arguing against a hypothetical that only exists in your own mind, and by your own admission, software updates are already and thing and this law already wouldn't be required to issue a software update that disables your car, and this doesn't actually bring us any closer to that. So already a moot point I guess? |
|
|
Considering generations of legislative compulsions to control unliked behavior
that is increasingly enabled by Gov's history + means + ever-ratcheting desire for surveillance of every possible person
and then allowing those astoundingly plain realities to coalesce into the world's least unlikely outcome
[pause]
this process of obviousness isn't actually restricted to just my head - as is evidenced by post after post after post on the very same page you're posting to.