|
|
|
|
|
|
by addicted
943 days ago
|
|
|
To the point, I completely agree that snap seems to work quite well for server software. Which makes it additionally frustrating that Canonical is insisting on forcing it on all the desktop users. No one is installing server software through the Software Center. So why does that have to prioritize Snaps? Canonical could very well have promoted snap as an option to package server software and used flatpaks or even debs for desktop software. There is no reason the 2 couldn’t exist as primary options at the same time for different use cases. |
|
|