|
|
|
|
|
|
by iamdave
5176 days ago
|
|
|
If there is no moral authority higher than humans then on what grounds do you begin to build a belief system. Genuine concern and consideration for another human being? And I disagree heavily with the idea that different opinions lays any sort of a setup for slavery, people disagree all the time; it's a side effect of humanity in a world that's rapidly starting to see cultural integrations on a level never before thought-of. I've always made the statement that I am an atheist until proven otherwise; don't confuse that with agnosticism, it means I do not see sufficient proof (or reason for that matter) to believe in a deity of which man should worship and this is a stance that I wont change until sufficient proof presents itself. |
|
|
One of the points the article was making was that people naturally distrust atheists due to the fact they cannot derive a morality based on humans alone not necessarily whether or not they believe in a diety. Which is why they often say I don't care what you believe in just believe in something higher than yourself. You are just stating a belief system i.e. I am a secular humanist not where this belief derived from i.e from rationality we derive our universal moral standards of concern and consideration for other humans. Or some form of utilitarianism that suggests that concern and consideration are in our best interests as a whole society.
In reality cultural integration is a bit of an illusion as hegemony rules the law of the land in most cases. Travel to Syria or North Korea right now and you will find that power is the morality people usually follow.
To believe that we are all self-rational actors heading towards some grand path of enlightenment and cultural integration in some far off utopia wonderland of cooperation and mutual self-benefit is to ignore the more animalistic and competitive bit of our nature.