|
|
|
|
|
by jholman
937 days ago
|
|
Wait, your argument is "this suspension by Apple couldn't be due to Apple catching them laundering money" because "this isn't money laundering" because "if someone laundered money this way, they would get caught"? Do you not understand that you just destroyed your own argument? And I have inside knowledge that you're wrong at least much of the time. This particular case, I have no idea, but extremely competent teams inside FAANG believe that there are many billions of dollars of attempted money laundering of this form, that they catch and stop. |
|