Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nunez 940 days ago
HyperV is fine for the basic stuff, but it's missing a lot of the other stuff that makes ESX so appealing (no direct vSAN or NSX equivalents, and you _need_ Windows to run Hyper-V vs ESX supporting liveboot on USB or CD). Also, I think ESX VMs are way faster than HyperV ones, but it's been a few years.
1 comments

Isn't Storage Spaces Direct an equivalent to vSan?
Storage Spaces Direct is a sure plan to have data loss. Such a piece of %#(