|
|
|
|
|
by WorldMaker
947 days ago
|
|
> Mercurial was never trying to "replace" git. All of these guys came out at the same time. Mercurial even had a couple weeks' head start on git, and git partly happened trying to replace Mercurial in early experimentation. The name "git" was always an interesting self-deprecating choice because it was (intentionally) "stupider" than its competition that it knew about, which included Mercurial (and also darcs/Monotone/Bazaar). |
|