|
|
|
|
|
by enord
936 days ago
|
|
These are technicalities IMO. There is nothing else to EA than the current institutions, people and praxis. If they become unfashionable or dishonored their moment will pass. It’s not some special new kind of cause, it’s just charity with an almost intolerably smug self-image. |
|
But the idea of bringing statistical rigor to charity is an important one, and it really was a development -- it came shockingly late. Statistics came late to baseball too, and plenty of people fought the idea, but it won pretty fast, because people in baseball care about winning. If* people doing charity really care about achieving the most good, it will win there, too.
* This is a nontrivial assumption.