|
|
|
|
|
by AnthonyMouse
942 days ago
|
|
> For something more recent, I'd recommend any of the books or documentaries on oxycontin sparking a more recent opium epidemic. As badly as the FDA failed, we'd be worse off if we didn't have one. I feel like the problem we have is that we've utterly failed at informed consent. You go to the doctor for a minor surgery and come home with a prescription for opioids. You take them even if you're not in any real discomfort, because your doctor prescribed them. Or maybe you could have done with half as much, but then there's a chance it wouldn't have been enough, and having the patient rely on their own judgment is discouraged. So now you're addicted to opioids. Then we get a backlash where the people who are actually in severe pain can't get their medication because doctors used to over-prescribe it. This entire system is asinine. The problem is not that people have access to opioids. Anybody can get them by going to a doctor and lying about their symptoms, therefore anybody should be able to just get them from the pharmacy. Stop rewarding mendacity. But the process of getting them from the pharmacy should require being informed of the risks so you can be responsible -- not being handed a bottle with a bunch of papers you're not going to read and then taking them whether you really need them or not. We need to stop banning everything and start better informing people so they can make reasonable choices. |
|
Purdue and our system of insurance created monetary incentives for doctors to overprescribe and misled them about the side effects. Normal people died even when they followed instructions because of the cycle of withdrawal symptoms.
History has repeated waves of addictive drugs because there's alway someone with an incentive to sell them. This is not a place where market outcomes work.