|
|
|
|
|
|
by cloverich
943 days ago
|
|
|
On the other hand, it seems rather intuitive we have a logic based component? Its the underpinning of science. We have to be taught when we've stumbled upon something that needs tested. But we can be taught that. And then once we learn to recognize it, we intuitively do so in action. ChatGPT can do this in a rudimentary way as well. It says a program should work a certain way. Then it writes it. Then it runs it. Then when the answer doesn't come out as expected (at this point, probably just error cases), it goes back and changes it. It seems similar to what we do, if on a more basic level. At any rate, it seems like a fairly straight forward 1-2 punch that, even if not truly intelligent, would let it break through its current barriers. |
|
|