Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by perihelions 946 days ago
It was a risky gambit for the first half of the signers. Was it not?
2 comments

I have no idea what the process was for gathering the signatures, but one way to solve this problem is a mutual confidentiality pact that goes away with enough momentum. Ask people if they're willing to sign, but if you can't get 50% of the people to sign the document and all the signatures go away.

Similar things are done when doing anonymous 360 surveys in the workplace. If not enough people in a certain pool respond, the feedback doesn't get shared.

Oh aye for sure - All unions are risky to start with, that's why you gotta keep them quiet until you have overwhelming support