|
|
|
|
|
by akira2501
941 days ago
|
|
> a biometric is _both_ a username & password It's just a username. As implemented the systems only require a username. It's also not even that, it's a temporal identifier, as faces change, sometimes in ways that we all expect and sometimes, not. To the extent that we've even performed facial transplants in response to some of these cases. If biometrics were going to work, we'd be using fingerprints already. For all the same reasons we don't use fingerprints, we won't be able to use facial identification. |
|
Not that I'm fond of this, just saying that it's not exactly just an username.
There is no culture of using secrets for authentication in any public setting. It all had always relied on biometrics, since times immemorial (people knowing how one looks like, then scaled up with printed documents, now scaled up again with machine-assisted recognition). Essentially, with some exceptions like high-security facilities, people had always relied on their public identities (self-asserted or asserted by a trusted third party, depending on the requirements) to get access.