[governmentdude]

The money solves problems, if I'm interpreting the article correctly. We usually don't concern ourselves with accountability for other government spending (from corp tax breaks for R&D to FEMA shelters/tarps, and not forgetting the infinitely juicy supply contracts, big4 consulting fees).

Why do you feel that poverty-relief is different to these other types of government spending? Why should it be held to a higher standard? What are your values?

[endisneigh]

When did I say it was different? There should be accountability there too.

[governmentdude]

> but how can you ensure accountability

Right there is where you suggest that accountability MUST be 'ensured'. This is a very high accounting standard to set, much higher than normal for any federal programs that I'm aware of. I don't understand why you feel that a program that relieves a core ill of society (poverty) should waste no money. Anything that reduces poverty makes the rest of government services cheaper, as it so closely relates to crime. Is it that you don't trust the decision making of the individuals just because they're poor? If not, then what is it you expect?

[endisneigh]

How much money should be spent?