|
|
|
|
|
by Someone
946 days ago
|
|
> There may be some theoretical limit of a "perfect" Go player, or maybe not, but it will continue to converge towards perfection by continuing to train I don’t think that’s a given. AlphaZero may have found an extremely high local optimum that isn’t the global optimum. When playing only against itself, it won’t be able to get out of that local optimum, and when getting closer and closer to it even may ‘forget’ how to play against players that make moves that AplhaGo never would make, and that may be sufficient for a human to beat it (something like that happened with computer chess in the early years, where players would figure out which board positions computers were bad at, and try to get such positions on the board) I think you have to keep letting it play against other good players (human or computer) that play differently to have it keep improving, and even then, there’s no guarantee it will find a global optimum. |
|