|
|
|
|
|
by harrisoned
947 days ago
|
|
Well, "safely" is subjective i guess. This means an AI that will not "get rogue and kill us all" or an AI that will not swear back at the user or generate unethical content even when prompted? I am really not concerned about the first aspect.
The second one is a lot harder to guarantee considering how those LLMs work. People will push them to the limit, and when there is no one to blame, they will blame the company who made to product. I am concerned that they will sacrifice usability, accuracy, and basically neuter the product because of that notion of safety. It's already happening, especially with Dall-e 3 where they pre-process your prompts at the API endpoint, that shows how scared they are about it being misused and how bad it can be to them, as the user can't be responsible for their own prompt. Bulding a safe complex tool like that, in that sense, that is devoid of any means of misuse is very very hard to do without making it bleak. I really hope something changes along the way to fix that. |
|