|
|
|
|
|
by chubot
944 days ago
|
|
Well that's always been the rub ... It's a non-profit AND a for-profit company (controlled by a non-profit) It's also extremely intertwined with and competes with for-profit companies Financially it's wholly dependent on Microsoft, one of the biggest for-profit companies in the world Many of the employees are recruited from for-profit companies (e.g. Google), though certainly many come from academic institutions too. So the whole thing is very messy, kind of "born in conflict" (similar to Twitter's history -- a history of conflicts between CEOs). It sounds like this is a continuation of the conflict that led to Anthropic a few years ago. |
|