[Cacti]

Just because something seems plausible doesn’t make it more likely. People are not LLMs, writing software is nothing like a house, being good at math doesn’t mean you’re good at other things, and bad analogies are just meaningless words.

[anonzzzies]

I didn’t say humans are LLMs; I am saying many humans are hallucinating parrots and dumber than LLMs. And when that is a president, LLMs can take power even though not necessarily related to human intelligence.

[mattigames]

Please, its dead obvious for anyone with a working brain that in average ChatGPT says a lot more true statments than Trumpt, and that didn't stop him in the slightest to become President, so judging those capabilities for estimating the potential damage it could make to society is just plain wrong.

[Cacti]

I mean if your only qualification for president is that they speak well, I’m not sure you understand what the president does.

[mattigames]

Pretty sure that if Trump can do it there is nothing remarkable about it, the only subject he had some remarkable insight was golf and nothing else. Unless you hold the believe that he hold the position without meeting the qualifications but that makes things go into a too subjective context.

Anyway, this has nothing to do with what I believe or not that the president does, it's about the intelectual level the general public demands to chose one, for chat-gpt the ability to be persuading it's far easier than the ability to reach AGI, the same happens with humans.