|
|
|
|
|
by zopa
939 days ago
|
|
Non-compete clauses are already extremely difficult to enforce. They're traditionally disfavored under common law; get one before a judge and it will frequently be struck out, or at minimum, sharply limited in scope. But it's not about winning an injunction or damages for the employers that use non-competes, it's about using the threat of a lawsuit to keep workers nice and biddable. So the bill is well worth doing, just people stop writing unenforceable bs into contracts. |
|
If this existed employers would be much more well behaved, if only because of the number of lawyers who would suddenly be willing to take on lawsuits without retainer.