Ahh I see. Blackstone and friends are pricing out regular people from shelter out of concern for the environment. This must be a big boost for their ESG score.
who do you expect to save the planet? the humans that don’t understand how to value it, or the companies that have made it their very business to value it?
By home, you mean a western-style stick built single-family residence with a garage and a spare bedroom? In many (maybe most?) parts of the world homes, owned or otherwise, are not constructed out of wood. I think the criticism would find a better mount on a land ownership argument. Though, units in multi-family buildings can be owned as well.
Homes allow for families to be established, families consume resources. So even if you found a way to build a home that’s more environmentally friendly, it’s still requires land which requires clear cutting of forests. And the family itself will need to eat which means the killing of more animals.