[RandomLensman]

Get a summary of a contract or law wrong, lose a few million dollars... it really is, sadly again, another peace of AI only for low risk applications.

[kubiton]

You make it out as all/most things we do is 'high risk'.

And I clearly showed an example how LLM is more an interface than a answering machine.

If a LLM understands the basics of law it is by sure much better than a lot of paralegals of transforming the info into search queries for a fact database.

And I'm pretty sure there are plenty of mistakes in existing law activities

[RandomLensman]

No, most/a lot of activities are low risk, but my point is we seem to struggle with AI in high risk while we automate human flaws.

Also, LLMs don't understand other than via the language representation.