[Kye]

This is a blog where you'll also find posts taking homeopathy seriously, and this post is based on a survey. Not a study. No scientific research is indicated here. It is not in any way scientifically rigorous. I don't know what you're on about about when you say goal posts or moving them. You said:

>> All available evidence does point to melatonin being an effective sleep aid.

What evidence?

>> "It is known to regulate sleep cycles"

Anecdotally, as best as you've demonstrated. This is not, as you claimed, "voluminous research and study done on melatonin."

If we're going with your silly metaphor, you moved the goal posts.

Anecdotes are not "voluminous research and study done on melatonin." A blog with no standards is not "voluminous research and study done on melatonin."

Show the "voluminous research and study done on melatonin" that you claimed exists or go away. I've made no claims to support. I've only asked you to back your own statements up.

Again, the burden of proof is on you.

[leptons]

>This is a blog where you'll also find posts taking homeopathy seriously, and this post is based on a survey.

You're seriously trying to say Johns Hopkins Medical Center is just some rando blog to try to prove your pointless point? You're either clueless or a really bad troll.

>What evidence?

Yeah, where's your evidence that it doesn't work?? Crickets.

>Anecdotally, as best as you've demonstrated. This is not, as you claimed, "voluminous research and study done on melatonin."

"It is known to regulate sleep cycles" is not anecdotal. This has been known science for quite a long time, no doubt before you were born, kiddo.

>Again, the burden of proof is on you.

I've provided proof, from a reputable medical source. You've provided nothing but your feels.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP. Without any proof from you, this conversation is really over.

[Kye]

I'm sorry the state of science education is so poor and you don't know how to tell a ghostwritten SEO blog from a scientific publication. You deserved better.

[leptons]

Thanks for the ad hominem, but you've proven nothing, shown no proof of anything, demanded proof and then moved goalposts when provided with citation from a noted medical establishment, and you've argued disingenuously.

I hope you have the day you deserve.

The burden of proof is now on you, so you lose by default since you've provided nothing to back up your claims. And that's the end of this stupid, pointless "conversation".