|
|
|
|
|
by badloginagain
943 days ago
|
|
I feel we hold up single-observability-solution as the Holy Grail, and I can see the argument for it- one place to understand the health of your services. But I've also been in terrible vendor lock-in situations, being bent over the barrel because switching to a better solution is so damn expensive. At least now with OTel you have an open standard that allows you to switch easier, but even then I'd rather have 2 solutions that meet my exact observability requirements than a single solution that does everything OKish. |
|
Vendor lock in with Otel now is hopefully a thing of the past - but now that more obs solutions are going open source, hopefully it's not necessarily true that one tool would be mediocre over all use cases (since DD and the likes are inherently limited by their own engineering teams, vs OSS products can have community/customer contributions to improve the surface area over time on top of the core maintainer's work).
[1] https://github.com/hyperdxio/hyperdx