|
|
|
|
|
by jmarbach
945 days ago
|
|
Yes, I agree with your point. It reminds me a little of the ongoing debate over CDN vs Edge. However, one difference we offer is that eventually our 'cache' will flush to a persistent storage layer - so you don't have to think about managing your memory or disk resources. Data not used for weeks ends up in low-cost object storage - further saving you from high-cost memory storage costs and the repetitive task of performing this archiving operation yourself. |
|
What happens if the server goes down before the flush?