|
|
|
|
|
|
by pdonis
945 days ago
|
|
|
> Right! They should transfer the liability to someone else! As I've already said in the post you responded to, if they can't find a friend or neighbor who will take the dog (and that might well be the case, I get that), they can take the dog to a shelter, whose job is to find suitable homes for pets. And who would be expected to do a better job of that than these people did. That is what I would do if I owned a dog that I realized I could not keep in my home. |
|
|
That is so grossly irresponsible, I’m glad to hear that you seem to have never had a dog.
No shelter is going to take a dog with a history of attacking people, let alone a kid.
At the point a dog is doing that, regardless of nature vs nurture, or who is ‘at fault’, it’s too late. They are an active hazard to everyone around them.
Does that suck? Yes.
Does pretending it’s not the case make it better? No, it compounds the damage and makes everything worse.