[troupo]

> Their nuclear reactors are 37 years old on average (they were originally only commissioned to run for 40 years, until an extension in 2012) [1]. They don't have a reactor younger than 21 years old [2]. So I would argue they did not just not diversify, they also neglected to keep up with building nuclear reactors.

Yup. Thanks to anti-nuclear lobby.

[RNAlfons]

What is this powerful anti-nuclear lobby in France supposed to be?

Please show us some sources.

[troupo]

> What is this powerful anti-nuclear lobby in France supposed to be?

1. France isn't an isolated country.

2. That "lobby" is decades of various actvists fear-mongering and politicians afraid of unpopular decisions.

And so you have:

--- start quote ---

In May 2001, an Ipsos poll found that nearly 70% of the population had a 'good opinion' of nuclear power, however 56% also preferred not to live near a nuclear plant.

In 2006, BBC/GlobeScan poll found 57% of the French opposed to nuclear energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France?wprov=...

--- end quote ---

Follow the link above for a description of anti-nuclear activism

[RNAlfons]

>1. France isn't an isolated country.

What is this supposed to mean? Do you want to imply that the German Green party for example, dictates the politics in France??

> 2. That "lobby" is decades of various actvists fear-mongering and politicians afraid of unpopular decisions.

Nuclear is popular in France...your own quote says it.

Not wanting to live near a nuclear plant is hardly an argument against nuclear power itself. You are twisting the facts.

> Follow the link above for a description of anti-nuclear activism

I did. The newest info on this powerful lobby:

> In March 2014, police arrested 57 Greenpeace protesters who used a truck to break through security barriers and enter the Fessenheim nuclear in eastern France.

This is hilarious. THIS is supposed to be that powerful anti-nuclear lobby in France? 57 Greenpeace protesters? Are you joking?