|
|
|
|
|
by bcx
952 days ago
|
|
If I recall the original FISA warrants were part of the US Patriot Act, which was one of the greatest increases in domestic surveillance in US history and brought about as an immediate response to 9/11. I haven't followed what it's been up to over the last 12 years, but it's nice there was actually some expiry in there. Certainly the US intelligence apparatus existed pre 9/11. Would FISA courts and secret warrants have prevented 9/11, who knows. Did all the agencies get a rubber stamp in everything they ever wanted in response to 9/11 under the guide of patriotism, during a period of intense groupthink -- likely. |
|
We already could have prevented 9/11 with the intelligence that we had at the time. Al-Qaeda was already known to be targeting US assets since the USS Cole bombing, every branch of the intelligence agency was already trying to spy on al-Qaeda[0], and the FBI specifically were already aware of the hijackers[1]. We even had multiple warnings from foreign governments about al-Qaeda[2].
The problem was a matter of correlating all that intelligence into some kind of actionable intervention. All the things I mentioned needed to be put together into a comprehensive list of people to arrest and where to find the evidence necessary to keep them behind bars for a decade. Anything less renders the whole effort futile - if you miss some hijackers, the attacks still happen; if you fail to make the charges stick, then the attacks happen later. More SIGINT doesn't always help: if anything, it means more information overload and more potentially missed threats.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Tenet#Al-Qaeda_and_the_...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijackers_in_the_September_11_...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks_advance-k...